tech e blog

  • by: Staff
  • posted: Displays, Home Theater, Video
  • 25 comments

10/15/2006

LCD vs. Plasma

In this news segment, "San Francisco Technology reporter Gabriel Slate looks at the difference between Lcd and Plasma Flat screen tv's." Video after the jump. Which do you prefer?
While it's not a good idea to compare apples and oranges, plasma seems to have the upper hand in terms of absolute quality. Still, the future seems to be turning towards LCD - the market for LCD TVs is poised to explode, and a boisterous crowd of hawkers are all offering LCD TV displays, some of which are good, some not so good, and some just plain shoddy
[via TomsHardware]

This entry was posted on 10/15/2006 03:00am and is filed under Displays, Home Theater, Video .
You can leave a response.

Other Related Posts

There are 25 comments about this post (1 pages).

1
Posted at 10/15/2006 03:33am by Nova79
i thought he said watching sports games is badd for plasma becasue of the score being displayed can cause burn-ins.Then in the the end he says,"Moives and Sports plasma is the best. What the heck is he saying? .....Im waiting for SEDs
2
Posted at 10/15/2006 05:13am by SES
Better to waiting on Laser TV!!
3
Posted at 10/15/2006 08:29am by ljcrabs
Burn in has been virtually eliminated, it shouldn't be a factor anymore.
4
Posted at 10/15/2006 6:08pm by link7373
Burn in on Plasma screens has been eliminated almost completly. The guys at dl.tv said they've tested plasma screens with the image on pause for 12 hours. What was left after 12 hours was a "residual image" if they turned the TV off. If tey turned it back on (or if they just changed channels), the residual image was imediatly removed and the picture was back to normal. I've got a 50" plasma and play games all the time - I've never had the health bar, ect burn in.
5
Posted at 10/15/2006 6:17pm by Bob/Paul
He said plasma for sports because plasma handles fast motion better than LCD.
6
Posted at 10/15/2006 9:00pm by Elmo
A nice idea, but he leaves out the fact the plasma bulbs are freaking expensive to replace.
7
Posted at 10/15/2006 10:42pm by Bob Jones
There are no bulbs to replace in a plasma display. You are thinking of DLP.
8
Posted at 10/15/2006 11:08pm by wwdd
great
9
Posted at 10/15/2006 11:11pm by calgeiser
blurring in LCDs? last time i checked there were lcd monitors with ~2ms response times.
10
Posted at 10/16/2006 01:31am by FINALLY, a legitimate LCD vs. Plasma comparison. | j4s0n Talks
[...] Yeah Right!read more | digg story [...]
11
Posted at 10/16/2006 02:18am by Mobile360
Need this I have been wondering for along time what to get over all value for money I would go for LCD but Plasa for Quality, add this to the favouries.
12
Posted at 10/16/2006 04:16am by blindrage
Biggest load of crap I've ever seen. Buy a plasma if you don't mind total failure in less than 5 years. High current device = high power device = high heat device = premature failure. LCDs produce better blacks and colors and I've NEVER seen one fail (except for the inverter circuit (backlight)) in 5 years. But if you're one of those rare people who can detect framerates lower than 24fps... go plasma...besides "Plasma" is just a sexier term than "LCD."
13
Posted at 10/16/2006 06:40am by jasper
SED tv for me and also as seen on DL.TV the thing whit Plasma and LCD tv its the image procesor that makes a big impact on image qualitie get a cheap LCD than you dont get the best quality of images. well ill wait for the 1st SED tv's/Monitors. ;)
14
Posted at 10/16/2006 08:35am by ahmet
i can tell that this is an old video because burn ins are eliminated and these prices are too high plus the screen size is higher than that you can get realu big lasmas and lcd those are not accurate anymore.
15
Posted at 10/16/2006 10:37am by Thom
to the person that said refresh time for LCDs its grey to grey, which leads to shit picture quality Plasma for overall quality with a good scource, but with what most people have LCD TVs should suffice. Ie most people have some of the worse scources known to man, but because they stats "Look" good they think they are going to be great
16
Posted at 10/16/2006 2:20pm by FINALLY, a legitimate LCD vs. Plasma comparison. at Goble Goble
[...] Good for all people in the market at a fork in the road as to what they should buy.read more | digg story » Filed under Uncategorized by melisa at 14:20. back to top [...]
17
Posted at 10/17/2006 10:36am by Greg
All I'll say is that I love my LCD HDTV (Philips 42PF9730A), and I watch sports on it all the time. I never see any motion blur or screen door effects that people complain about with some other TVs. My only complaint isn't even with the TV, but the crappy NBC HD signal (they can't even get the sound synced right for Sunday Night Football).
18
Posted at 10/17/2006 12:50pm by budrow
This news click stinks. what about LCOs and DLP for larger screens? The only good thing that was said is it's personal preference.
19
Posted at 10/17/2006 2:13pm by tash
Why don't you blog about _current_ information and actually link to the original article http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/03/09/lcd_or_plasma_/index.html
20
Posted at 10/22/2006 1:45pm by SED TV
We'll all be amazed by the quality of the SED image when it comes out next year. Too expensive? Probably.
21
Posted at 10/29/2006 01:37am by Fill
Hallo! I'm Bob Stuart programmer.I know that all spam it's biggest trouble of WWW. My site.: SPAM BLOCKER Join to block spam![url=http://hometown.aol.com/design2006/]SPAM BLOCKER[/url]
22
Posted at 11/21/2006 08:29am by jonny
jonny
23
Posted at 11/24/2006 3:33pm by 我不喜欢-Blog » LCD vs. Plasma
[...] 原始文章/Original post and Wobuxihuan.org [...]
24
Posted at 01/12/2007 01:42am by hilton
svabodu belarusii The tresses is one and only of enough measure to current a serene boundary. This element ships in - days.
25
Posted at 01/28/2007 11:02pm by jenna jameson lesbian
jenna jameson lesbian TechEBlog » LCD vs. Plasma
You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to login or create a user account now

subscribe rss 2.0

hot posts

recommended

our friends